Rating: 4/5
Review:
Not one of Vickers' best
I enjoyed Grandmothers, but I did have reservations.
Salley Vickers tells
the story of three quite different characters who are grandmothers
(strictly, two are grandmothers and one is a good friend who fulfils
the role) who don’t know each other at the beginning of the book.
They each have a close relationship with and often take care of one
grandchild, and their stories develop over one year, during which
they overlap and interact. Vickers uses this structure to explore
those relationships, to examine their effect on and importance to
both the grandmothers and the children and to give her views on a
variety of topics, some neatly, some rather clumsily.
Vickers, as always,
paints intimate and compassionate portraits of her subjects, both
adult and child. They are strong, thoughtful and insightful pictures
by and large. (The men are peripheral and largely act as cyphers for
male failings, but this is a book about the women and the children
they relate to and the focus is rightly on them). She writes very
well, of course, and I found the book an easy and quite involving
read much of the time, but there was a lot of familiar ground:
slightly lost women finding fulfilment and new delight in life, the
significance of art, especially religious art and angels, the
importance of great religious buildings and so on don’t have quite
the freshness and emotional impact they did when I first read Miss
Garnet’s Angel and The Cleaner of Chartres, for example. There is
quite a lot of quotation and cultural reference which I felt verged
on showing off, and I found the ending, which is intended to be
moving, rather sentimental and twee. Vickers also goes a bit over the
top in her prose occasionally. For example, a character is
reminiscing while boarding a train:
“Her mind
arabesqued – as she begged the man whose aisle seat was next to the
window seat that her ticket proclaimed hers to excuse her – to how
they had dined...” That’s a bit rich for me, and although it
only happened a few times, I think Salley Vickers is better than
that.
Overall, this is a
recommendable read, but in spite of some very good things about it, I
don’t think it’s one of Salley Vickers’ best. 3.5 stars,
rounded up to 4.
(My thanks to
Penguin for an ARC via NetGalley.)