Rating: 4/5
Review:
Readable, but rather familiar ideas
I find it quite difficult to review eden. I enjoyed the writing and
became quite engaged with the characters, but I wasn’t sure that it
added up to all that much in the end.
Set in the Garden Of
Eden long, long after Adam and Eve have left, we see a picture
closely resembling an oppressive, totalitarian regime. Those
remaining in the Garden have eternal life; they do not age nor bear
children. The price for being fed and sheltered for eternity is hard
daily work tending the Garden and subservience to a hierarchy of
angels. These are physically splendid but morally flawed, bird-like
creatures without arms and with beaks, who enforce rigid routines and
dispense propaganda about the dreadful life lived in the outside
world. We see into the minds of a go-between (or snitch) who informs
on his fellow “habitants”, of a hard-working, decent orchardman
and a rebellious woman who has somehow escaped Eden just before the
narrative begins.
Setting such a story
in Eden is subversive and clever, and could be read as a satire of
organised religion, offering (in this case, literal) eternal life but
requiring subservience, labour, adherence to strict ritual and
acceptance of hierarchy in the life currently being lived. Habitants
also have an unrealistically hubristic view of their own superiority
and benevolence, angels are enforcers flawed by pomopsity and
arrogance, but as one habitant asks, “What can an angel do without
a little help, except expect to be obeyed?”
The thing is, I’m
not sure it says anything very fresh or new. There are echoes here
of Brave New World, for example, and especially of the conversation
between Mustapha Mond and the Savage. There are some rather
well-worn ideas about freedom, for example “being free to die is
also surely being free to live as well.” The poisonous effect of
envy and spite on an ordered community was well done but not terribly
original. I enjoyed the prose, the book was atmospheric and quite
involving, but in the end I wasn’t sure I’d really got much out
of it.
I thought Harvest
was an outstanding, original book showing the fragility of an ordered
community subjected to disruptive influences. This covers some of
the same ground but for me doesn’t have the same depth of insight.
I have rounded 3.5 stars up to 4 because it was quite an involving
read, but it’s a qualified recommendation.
(My thanks to
Picador for an ARC via NetGalley.)